Proxies, browser agents, remote scanners, sandboxes, CDN add-ons and client-side security platforms are not variations on one product. They sit in different places, and where a tool sits decides what it can see and what it can stop. That, rather than a feature list, is what should drive the choice.
Feature lists in this category converge, because everybody eventually ships an alert, a dashboard and a compliance report. What does not converge is where each tool sits between your servers and your visitor's screen. A server-side component runs inside your application, a proxy carries your scripts, an agent and a sandbox load on your page. Every one of those is something of theirs that can fail while your customers are mid-session, and when it does it is your incident. We are in none of those positions.
Remote scanners are not on this line at all. They visit from outside on a schedule, so they see what your site serves a robot, not what it serves your customers.
Each page explains how that approach works, what it is good at, and what it is structurally unable to see or stop. None of them quote anybody's pricing or link out to a competitor, because both change without notice and a published comparison that leans on them is wrong the day they do.
Routing scripts through a third party so they can be blocked there, against having the browser itself refuse them and archive what ran.
Synthetic visits that need no change to your site, against telemetry from the sessions your real customers have.
Adding a script to watch the other scripts, against using the enforcement and reporting the browser already performs.
A wrapper layer that constrains what third-party scripts may do, against the browser enforcing those constraints natively.
Client-side security bundled into infrastructure you already have, against a platform chosen for the job and independent of it.
Protecting your own code from inspection and tampering, against knowing what third-party code did on your pages.
Both work from the reports browsers already send. What changes when the platform also gets you to an enforcing policy and keeps the evidence.
From writing your own endpoint to a full platform, what each route to collecting CSP reports actually costs you.
Report URI is a client-side security platform. Every modern browser can already refuse unauthorised scripts, withdraw capabilities your site never uses, and reject code that arrives without integrity metadata — it just needs to be told what to allow. We are where that policy gets decided, deployed and kept honest, and where the browser reports back what it enforced.
That makes the browser your enforcement point rather than a box in front of it. Unauthorised code is refused at the moment it would have executed, on the visitor's own machine, below anything a script on the page could reach. Nothing of ours runs on your site, so there is nothing to review before a release, nothing to slow a page down, and nothing that stops working if we have a bad day.
The record comes from the same place. Because it is generated by real sessions it covers the pages an outside visit never reaches — authenticated areas, the checkout flow, region-specific content, whichever variant a customer was bucketed into. And because browsers report a cryptographic fingerprint of every script they execute, we fetch that file, re-hash it, and archive it only when the bytes match, so the copy we hold is provably the code that ran. Fourteen report types arrive through the same endpoint.
One header. No code. Reports start arriving from your first visitor.
30-day free trial · One header · No code · Cancel anytime
These separate the architectures faster than a feature matrix does, and they apply to us as much as to anyone else — so our own answer is on each one.
Does this see my authenticated pages?
Anything driven by an external visit sees only what is publicly reachable, and payment flows usually are not. Card skimming targets the pages behind a login.
What is added to my site, and what happens if it fails?
A proxy sits in the path of your pages loading. An agent is a script running on them. Either one can take your site down, and it will be your incident, not theirs.
Can you show me the actual script, months later?
After an incident the artefact is what matters. Most tools describe that something changed rather than keeping the file that changed.
Does this cover anything beyond scripts?
Certificates, email authentication, transport security, cross-origin isolation and network failures all break in ways that matter, and they break silently.
Is the pricing published?
A quote-only vendor puts a procurement cycle between you and knowing whether the product suits you at all.
How quickly can I prove it works?
Anything needing a deployment, an agent rollout or a sales call is slower to evaluate than a header you can set this afternoon.